
Total Pageviews
Labels
- Ancient Music in the Pines
- Auras
- Con cái và Cha mẹ
- Dance Your Way to God
- Dang Dang Doko Dang
- Dhammapada: Con đường của Phật
- Dimensions Beyond the Known
- Finger Pointing to the Moon
- From Sex to Superconsciousness
- God is Dead - Now Zen is the Only Living Truth
- Life of Osho
- Love
- No God
- No Water No Moon
- Osho Book Collection
- Osho Dictionary
- Osho's Life
- Parents & Children
- Thiền định Mỗi tuần
- Thiền Thế Kỷ 21
- What Is Meditation
- Zen: The Path of Paradox
Powered by Blogger.
Translate
Monday, September 25, 2017
Life of Osho
Chapter 8. “I Am for Absolutely Everything” - Osho
Life of Osho
Chapter 8. “I
Am for Absolutely Everything”
Among the groups which started
that winter was a vipassana group. Like all the big groups it was residential;
it went on for ten days, with a schedule of sitting which started before dawn
and went on until late at night; and I ended up running it. There was little
enough to do, but I was given the opportunity to meditate as much as I wanted.
So it was, within a short matter of weeks, that Osho kept his promise to teach
me vipassana for as long as I wanted to stay in Poona. He offered me food and
shelter for as long as I cared to take it and he did so with an openhandedness
which touched even me.
My most vivid memories of Osho
are of him at darshan, and this was very tied up with the vipassana group. As increasing
numbers of people began to arrive in Poona and more and more groups were
started, Osho would say to newcomers to try this or that group; and at the end
of any group everyone who had taken part would go to darshan together.
As group leader I would get to
go along too, and this meant that I had a ringside view of Osho at work, in
hands-on stuff with people.
The mise-en-scene of darshan
never changed. You went in and sat down on the floor in a semicircle round the
empty chair. Then, like the light-switch had been thrown, Osho made his
entrance. He had a superb command of theatre. Namasteing gravely (or was it
with a trace of irony?) to everyone, he crossed the porch, sat down, and his small
retinue would arrange themselves around him. Vivek sat to one side, Laxmi a
little further back, while another devotee sat on the other side of Osho’s
chair. Shiva, the redheaded Scots photographer and bodyguard, who in the course
of time was to play the part of Judas, stood in the background. None of them moved.
There were exotic potted plants, in silhouette. The scene was as composed and brightly
lit as a Nativity.
Osho would cross one leg over
the other and, so far as I can remember, never move the lower part of his body
again during the darshan. Though he was sitting in a modern armchair, he sat in
as stable and rooted a posture as any Buddha.
Perhaps he would thoughtfully
rearrange a fold of his robe… How he got away with it, I’ll never know. He just
acted as though he was King, and that was all there was to it. Krishnamurti is
the only other person I have seen who could carry the same thing off: could
convey that sense of inherent aristocracy, of belonging to a different order of
being. He too, if you could get close to him physically, seemed to have a subtle
energy-field surrounding him, something you could actually feel… yet Osho was
much more complex than Krishnamurti. Osho had an edge of pure mischief quite
missing from the older man. That’s what makes describing him so tricky, for
whatever you say about him you have to add that the opposite could also be
true. Regal he was – but in a flash he was like Dennis the Menace. The whole
scene on that porch kept shifting. Nothing seemed properly fixed. That’s another
thing I remember about darshan: feeling vaguely sea-sick.
In his lectures on Tilopa, Osho
had said: “Tantra is a great yea-sayer; it says yes to everything. It has
nothing like ‘no’ in its vocabulary, there is no negation. It never says no to
anything, because with no the fight starts, with no you become the ego. The
moment you say no to anything, you have become the ego already; a conflict has
come in, now you are at war.
“Tantra loves, and loves
unconditionally. It never says no to anything whatsoever, because everything is
part of the whole, and everything has its own place in the whole, and the whole
cannot exist with anything missing from it.
“It is said that even if a drop
of water is missing, the whole existence will thirst. You pluck a flower in the
garden, and you have plucked something out of the whole existence. You harm a
flower, and you have harmed millions of stars – because everything is
interrelated. The whole exists as a whole, as an organic whole. The whole
exists not as a mechanical thing – everything is related to everything else.
“So Tantra says yes
unconditionally. There has never been any other vision of life which says yes
without any conditions – simply yes. No disappears; from your very being no disappears.
When there is no no, how can you fight? How can you be at war? You simply
float. You simply merge and melt. You become one. The boundaries are there no
more. No creates the boundary. No is the boundary around you. Whenever you say
no, watch – immediately something closes in.
Whenever you say yes, your
being opens… “When you say total yes to existence, the whole existence suddenly
is transformed; then there are no more rocks, no more trees, no more persons,
rivers, mountains – suddenly everything has become one, and that oneness is
God.”
That’s what he was doing at
darshan, trying to get people to say yes. To say yes to themselves. To say yes
to themselves just as they were – without changing a thing.
What would happen was that
someone would go up, sit down in the hot seat, cross their legs, and launch
into their tale of woe… It was amazing to sit there night after night and see
how worthless most human beings secretly believe themselves to be… Osho would
sit motionless and listen with that extraordinary intent receptivity he had.
When they were done, he would pause and then (and this was done differently for
different types of people) say that, yes he could understand how they felt
that, but from his point of view this was not really a problem at all… in fact
you could see it as being a very positive sign…
What he did at darshan was to
lead you personally through a process of self-acceptance. Perhaps it was
through having seen so many thousands of people but he had an extraordinary
knack of detecting where a person’s problem really lay – and was very sensitive
in opening this up to the person themselves… But once he had got you there, to
you seeing the basic thing you were on about, then all his skill was thrown
into getting you to feel all right about it. His virtuosity was dazzling. He
reasoned, he tricked, he cajoled.
Perhaps he did it by laughter,
by making you see how absurd was your insistence on your own unhappiness. He
was perfectly capable of just making silly faces. But one way or another he got
everyone into the present moment, and showed you that in that present moment
there was nothing resembling a ‘problem.’ Everything was fine just the way it was…
At this point you could see that Osho was playing one of the most ancient
religious functions of all. He forgave. He remitted sins. He healed. He swept
you up and showed you that seen through the eyes of Love you were perfect and whole
just the way you were. That was the real source of his power. Simply he loved –
loved without any edges. And thousands and thousands of people were to respond
to that, to the feeling he was the first person who had ever really understood them
and accepted them just as they were. “I am never against anything” he declared
one evening. “I am for absolutely everything, so just enjoy it.”
If, despite all he did, someone
insisted on feeling guilty then he would roll up his sleeves, so to speak, and
really get down to business. There’s a famous line in Nietzsche, ”Not your
vices, but your mediocrity cries aloud to heaven.” Osho seems to have taken
this and turned it into a positive basis for therapy. If, for instance, someone
said they were getting angry the whole time, Osho wouldn’t say, o no, you
shouldn’t be doing that;- on the contrary he would turn the whole thing round
on itself. The problem, he would say, was that you were not getting angry enough.
“When anger comes you are not
to do anything: just sit silently and watch it. Don’t be against it, don’t be
for it. Don’t cooperate with it, don’t repress it. Just watch it, be patient,
just see what happens… This is the moment to meditate. Don’t waste this moment;
anger is creating such great energy in you…
“Close the room, keep a mirror
in front of you, see your angry face yourself. There is no need to show it to anybody
else. It is your business, it is your energy, it is your life, and you have to
wait for the right moment. Go on looking in the mirror, see the red face, the
red eyes, the murderer there… ‘Know thyself’ does not mean sit silently and
repeat, ‘I am Brahma, I am Soul, I am God, I am This’ – all nonsense. ‘Know
thyself’ means know all thy climates, all possibilities – the murderer, the
sinner, the criminal, the saint, the holy man inside you; the virtue, the God,
the Devil…
“If you don’t do anything, what
is going to happen? Can anger hang there forever and forever? Nothing hangs
there forever… Let your face go ugly and murderous – but wait, watch. Don’t
repress and don’t act according to the anger, and soon you will see that the
face is becoming softer, eyes are becoming calmer, the energy is changing – the
male turning into female… and soon you will be full of radiance. The same
redness that was anger, now is a certain radiance – a beauty on your face, in
your eyes. Now go out: the time has come to act.”
Darshan was like some mad
doctor’s surgery. A doctor who gave only one prescription, whatever it was you
said was the matter: do more of it! do much more of it! If you want to be free
of something you must do it totally. Being total – that was something he was
always going on about in those days.
He spoke of the way a young
child gets angry: “If he is angry, he is just anger, pure anger. It is
beautiful to see a child in anger, because old people are always halfhearted: even
if they are angry they are not totally in it, they are holding back. They don’t
love totally, they are not angry totally; they don’t do anything in totality,
they are always calculating.
Their life has become lukewarm.
It never comes to that intensity of one hundred degrees where things evaporate,
where something happens, where revolution becomes possible.
“But a child always lives at
one hundred degrees – whatsoever he does. If he hates you he hates you totally,
if he loves you he loves you totally; and in a single moment he can change. He
is so quick, he does not take time, he does not brood over it. Just one moment
before he was sitting in your lap and telling you how much he loves you. And
then something happens – you say something and something goes wrong between you
and him – and he jumps out of your lap and says ‘I never want to see you
again.’ And see in his eyes the totality of it!
“And because it is total it
does not leave a trace behind. That’s the beauty of totality: it does not
accumulate psychological memory. Psychological memory is created only by partial
living. Then everything that you have lived only in part hangs around you, the
hangover continues for your whole life. And thousands of things are there,
hanging unfinished.
“That’s the whole theory of
karma: unfinished jobs, unfinished actions go on waiting to be finished, to be
completed.”
That first evening out with
Asha…
A group of us were having
supper on the ramshackle balcony of a Goan restaurant, a few doors up from the
West End Cinema, with its scratchy Third World prints of Hollywood movies, just
round the corner from M.G. Road.
Somehow I had contrived to sit
next to her. Weeks must have gone by because the heat was already starting to
build up again; we were drinking bottles of cold lager.
I was very nervous. I watched
her long fine hands. I couldn’t believe that everyone else couldn’t see how
beautiful she was. Strange how alone that made her seem… We must have been
talking about surviving in India (what little money I had was almost completely
gone) when, towards the end of her second bottle of beer, she said to me
confidentially: “I got paid six thousand dollars for checking a suitcase on to
a plane for Canada.” She paused. “Direct from Bombay” she added, as though that
were significant.
For a moment I didn’t
understand what she was talking about – then I got it. Drugs.
“Just for checking the bag in?”
I asked.
I hadn’t known you got paid
that much. Her air of elegance fell into place. Converted into rupees six
thousand dollars was a small fortune.
“Yes” she said. ”It was a
kamikaze… And they were old friends of mine.”
I must have looked blank – a
what? – and all I could think of saying was: “But I thought the problem was
taking the suitcase off at the other end?”
She glanced at me, murmured
something about having done it before, and changed the subject. I seemed to
have put my foot in it. Six thousand dollars? Who paid you that kind of money?
Asha – I thought, stunned –
Asha is a gangster.
That’s what I thought he was
doing, you see. I thought he was encouraging everybody to find out what they
really wanted to do and to do it. I thought he was taking anarchism to its
logical conclusion. In Hammer on the Rock, one of the early compilations of
Osho at darshan, there is the following note apropos of Primal Therapy:
“Bhagwan has described it not so much as a therapy as a situation where people
can let go into their fears and madnesses, their obsessions and secret
hankerings, in a safe and protected environment and where help can be given to
see beyond them.”
Not so much a therapy as a
situation. In fact as part of an interlocking series of situations, all of which
were designed to allow people to accept themselves as they were and then enact
what they really wanted to do. I thought he was using the therapy groups as
building blocks in this process – blocks which interlocked into a space, a real
space where you could explore without fear the way you truly were.
But by no means was this just
restricted to therapy grouprooms. The whole of Poona had this live-it-out
quality. Nothing was forbidden. This was the reason Osho allowed, even
encouraged, some people to be really obnoxious. To go, for instance, on all the
stupid power trips for which the ashram was to become so notorious. He had to.
He was forced to by his own logic. For it was no good repressing anything, you’d
never get rid of it that way. The demons and ghosts had to come out of the
machine. You had to live them through. The whole of Poona had this quality of
being a kind of theatre, or madhouse.
“The whole point of all
therapies” he said “of all group processes, is to create a situation where
people can dare – that’s all. How you create that is irrelevant. You give them
an impetus and a challenge. You open an abyss before them, and you tempt them
to jump. The group is needed because when they are alone they will never dare,
they will be too much afraid.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




No comments:
Post a Comment